No. P3/2/VDC DT.
30.08.2013
To
The Chief Postmaster
General,
Tamilnadu Circle,
Chennai 600 002.
Respected Madam,
Sub: Request to allow to sit in IP Examination for the year 2013 – Case
of
Sri. M. Ganesh , SPM, Perungaiyur, Vriddhachalam Division – Reg.
Ref: PMG, CR No. REP/7-88/13-TR dt. 19.08.2013
communicated in SPOs., VDL
No. B II/128/2013 dt. 22.8.2013.
…..
This is the case of non
allowing, to sit in the IP examination under Departmental quota for
the year 2013, of the noted official on
the subject.
It was informed by the R.O.,
Trichy vide their
letter cited that on the reason “ Censured vide SP,VDC memo. No.
CPT/Misc/2011 dt. 30.11.2011” the
official was not permitted to sit in
the said examination. In this connection we are placing the following for your kind
consideration and for taking
immediate decision .
1. As per the conditions
laid down in para 9 of the IP recruitment notification dt.
17.06.2013
in file No.A/34012/05/2013/DE, in this case, there is no disc. Action pending/ contemplated against the official; no punishment is current and no adverse entry in the last five years of his APAR.
in file No.A/34012/05/2013/DE, in this case, there is no disc. Action pending/ contemplated against the official; no punishment is current and no adverse entry in the last five years of his APAR.
2 In the APAR for the period from 1.4.2011 to
19.8.2011; 12.9.11 to 31.3.2012 and
1.4.2012 to 31.3.2013,the official was awarded with overall grading of 5.1, 5.7, and 7.4 and hence there is no adverse grading, except an entry of awarding of Censure on 30.11.2011.
1.4.2012 to 31.3.2013,the official was awarded with overall grading of 5.1, 5.7, and 7.4 and hence there is no adverse grading, except an entry of awarding of Censure on 30.11.2011.
3. More over the ‘Censure’
will have the effect of one
year only from the date of awarding
and in his case his period is over by 1.12.2012.
and in his case his period is over by 1.12.2012.
4.
As per para (7) of Rule 11 of CCS (CCA)
Rules 1965, the eligibility of a Govt. Servant, who
has been awarded the penalty of Censure, to appear at a Deptl/promotional exam, awarding
of Censure cannot be bar to sit in the examination, if otherwise found fit and overall
assessment of his service record,should be taken into account , while deciding the case. In his case the overall assessment as per his recorded APAR is good/ very good and even he
was allowed by the same SPOs., VDL , to officiate as IP during the currency of ‘Censure’
Period.
has been awarded the penalty of Censure, to appear at a Deptl/promotional exam, awarding
of Censure cannot be bar to sit in the examination, if otherwise found fit and overall
assessment of his service record,should be taken into account , while deciding the case. In his case the overall assessment as per his recorded APAR is good/ very good and even he
was allowed by the same SPOs., VDL , to officiate as IP during the currency of ‘Censure’
Period.
5. No administrative instruction can over rule the statutory rules of the Govt. and hence any
orders or instructions issued by any executive authority against this, will not be valid on any
account.
orders or instructions issued by any executive authority against this, will not be valid on any
account.
All the
connected records/orders are enclosed herewith for your ready reference .
Hence , on any account ,
his candidature for the IP
exam . should not be debarred and
he should be allowed to sit in the ensuing
examination.
Being the date
of examination of the IP Exam . is noted as 14.9.2013 and
15.9.2013, the time is
very short, and hence we request
that the same may kindly be pursued at the immediate so as to
allow the said official to sit in the examination.
With regards,
(J. RAMAMURTHY)
CIRCLE SECRETARY.
